Frontier models above a defined capability threshold need a codified, transparent federal safety-review process, replacing the ad hoc Cabinet-level negotiation used in the 2026 Fable 5/Mythos 5 case.
Verification Status
AI-researched, unverifiedLast Reviewed
Jul 4, 2026
Cited Sources
9
The specific delta between this position and the current mainstream approaches of both major parties.
The current Republican administration has pursued broad AI deregulation — rescinding Biden's AI oversight executive order, publishing the deregulatory AI Action Plan, and reorienting the renamed AI standards center (CAISI) toward competitiveness over safety testing — and has pushed federal preemption of state AI-safety laws specifically (EO 14365, DOJ suing Colorado). Democratic governors (Hochul in New York, Newsom in California) have been the ones building frontier-safety disclosure regimes at the state level. But this isn't a clean partisan story: the Senate voted 99-1 to strip a federal preemption moratorium from a 2025 reconciliation bill — a nearly unanimous, cross-party rejection of blanket preemption — and a bipartisan discussion draft (Reps. Obernolte, R, and Trahan, D) proposes a narrower, time-limited preemption instead of the administration's sweeping version. The Innovation Party's delta: side with the bipartisan instinct behind the 99-1 vote and the Obernolte-Trahan draft — a federal floor, not a blanket override of state safety innovation — against both the administration's broad preemption push and a patchwork of state laws with no floor at all.
Turn frustration into useful pressure.
If this position misses evidence or a lived consequence, challenge it. If it holds up, help test it locally and connect it to the issues around it.