Loading issue research
Protect unenumerated liberty through statutory privacy, medical-data, family-autonomy, and anti-surveillance safeguards without pretending the Ninth Amendment alone restores rights current doctrine has narrowed.
Verification Status
AI-researched, unverifiedLast Reviewed
Jul 5, 2026
Cited Sources
8
The specific delta between this position and the current mainstream approaches of both major parties.
Republicans are exposed on Inconsistency when limited-government rhetoric gives way to broad surveillance of medical, reproductive, family, or travel records. Democrats are exposed on Ill-Informed design when they speak as if federal reproductive-health privacy rules or pre-Dobbs doctrine still settle the issue; the closest Democratic-sponsored fix, the My Body, My Data Act (Sens. Wyden and Hirono, Rep. Jacobs), covers exactly this data-broker and app gap and has been reintroduced repeatedly since 2022 without a floor vote in either chamber. The Republican side of this comparison is an interpretive characterization of a general deregulatory and surveillance-enforcement pattern rather than a single named plank, since no comparably specific Republican-sponsored medical-privacy bill exists to cite as a counterpart. The Innovation Party's delta is to update the legal footing: defend autonomy, admit the doctrine, and build enforceable privacy and process rules now.
Turn frustration into useful pressure.
If this position misses evidence or a lived consequence, challenge it. If it holds up, help test it locally and connect it to the issues around it.